Use the provided propensity scores and a set of covariates to match target to comparator persons.
matchOnPsAndCovariates( population, caliper = 0.2, caliperScale = "standardized logit", maxRatio = 1, allowReverseMatch = FALSE, cohortMethodData, covariateIds )
A data frame with the three columns described below.
The caliper for matching. A caliper is the distance which is acceptable for any match. Observations which are outside of the caliper are dropped. A caliper of 0 means no caliper is used.
The scale on which the caliper is defined. Three scales are supported:
caliperScale = 'propensity score',
caliperScale = 'standardized', or
caliperScale = 'standardized logit'.
On the standardized scale, the caliper is interpreted in standard
deviations of the propensity score distribution. 'standardized logit'
is similar, except that the propensity score is transformed to the logit
scale because the PS is more likely to be normally distributed on that scale
The maximum number of persons in the comparator arm to be matched to each person in the treatment arm. A maxRatio of 0 means no maximum: all comparators will be assigned to a target person.
Allows n-to-1 matching if target arm is larger
One or more covariate IDs in the
cohortMethodData object on which
subjects should be also matched.
Returns a tibble with the same columns as the input data plus one extra column: stratumId. Any rows that could not be matched are removed
The data frame should have the following three columns:
rowId (numeric): A unique identifier for each row (e.g. the person ID).
treatment (integer): Column indicating whether the person is in the target (1) or comparator (0) group.
propensityScore (numeric): Propensity score.
The default caliper (0.2 on the standardized logit scale) is the one recommended by Austin (2011).
Rassen JA, Shelat AA, Myers J, Glynn RJ, Rothman KJ, Schneeweiss S. (2012) One-to-many propensity score matching in cohort studies, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, May, 21 Suppl 2:69-80.
Austin, PC. (2011) Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies, Pharmaceutical statistics, March, 10(2):150-161.